![]() |
|
|
| Population alarmists Source - Investor's Business Daily |
|
|
The great British broadcaster Sir David Attenborough has become the latest in a long line of illustrious people to say we need to cut population growth sharply or face a grim future. Is he right? Attenborough, in supporting Britain's Optimum Population Trust – a group that advocates reducing human numbers – has put himself on the wrong side of one of the great questions of our time, says Investor's Business Daily (IBD). When you say it that way, it does sound dramatic and, as Attenborough put it, "frightening." The problem is, numbers lie. Past estimates of population growth have virtually always overestimated world fertility rates, and underestimated social trends that led to fewer babies. This time will be no different, says IBD: |
Pushing for population decline is a fool's errand. Our biggest problem in the next 100 years won't be too many people; it will be figuring out how a shrinking base of younger workers will be able to pay for our fast-expanding population of elderly retirees. To do this, we'll need to have more babies, not fewer. Attenborough is wrong, but then so are all those who want to shrink humanity, says IBD. Source: Editorial, Population Alarmists, Investor's Business Daily, April 14, 2009. For text: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=473850 For more on Social Issues: http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=28 FMF Policy Bulletin/ 21 April 2009 |
|
Did you find this article informative? Would you like to send us your comments on this article? If so simply complete the form below. |
Your Comments: |
|
Your Name: Your E-Mail address: |
|
| Home Back | Search | ||||
| Terms & Conditions • Privacy Statement | |||||