The 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between the United States, Mexico and Canada eliminated trade barriers among the three nations. As a result, the whole U.S. economy is better off, says Daniel T. Griswold. Between 1994 and 2000, civilian employment in the U.S. economy rose by a net 12 million; the unemployment rate fell from 6 percent to 4 percent; and U.S. manufacturing output rose 40 percent while the volume of imported manufactured goods doubled.
NAFTA helped to stimulate America's longest post-war economic expansion:
In the first eight years of NAFTA, manufacturing output in the United States rose at an annual average rate of 3.7 percent 50 percent faster than during the eight years before the agreement.
The number of Americans employed in manufacturing grew by half a million in the first five years of NAFTA.
Critics who predicted that a free trade agreement with Mexico would cause a mass movement of American companies to Mexico have been proved wrong:
U.S. manufacturers invest an average of about $2 billion a year in Mexico, compared to almost $200 billion invested in domestic manufacturing annually.
U.S. companies currently own more direct manufacturing investment in the tiny Netherlands ($34.7 billion) than they do in Mexico ($19.7 billion).
In addition, the economic competition from NAFTA has helped to bring about a more competitive political system in Mexico. Vicente Fox was elected president only a few years after NAFTA was enacted, ending decades of one-party rule. NAFTA has also encouraged higher regulatory standards in Mexico and more cross-border cooperation on environmental issues.
Source: Daniel T. Griswold, NAFTA Benefits Arizona, July 2, 2003, Cato Institute.
For text http://www.cato.org/dailys/07-02-03.html
For more on NAFTA http://www.ncpa.org/iss/tra/
FMF Policy Bulletin/15 July 2003
Publish date: 23 July 2003
The views expressed in the article are the author’s and are not necessarily shared by the members of the Foundation.