Ethanol Subsidies Have Doubled Maize Prices
In early July, it appeared that a bipartisan group of senators had come up with a plan to end the 45-cents-per-gallon corn (maize) ethanol subsidy almost immediately rather than wait for it to expire, as planned, on December 31. But that deal never passed both houses of Congress. The result: $6 billion in annual subsidies are still being given to an industry that is helping drive up food prices during the worst recession in modern history, says Robert Bryce, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
The ethanol industry will continue getting subsidies while gobbling up gargantuan quantities of corn, which, in turn, is increasing the cost of food at the grocery store at the very same time that huge numbers of Americans are unemployed and/or collecting food stamps.
The official U.S. unemployment rate stands at 9.1 per cent, but the actual rate of underemployment may be closer to 23 per cent.
Furthermore, 45.7 million Americans about 14.6 per cent of the population now rely on federal food stamps.
Since October 2008, the number of Americans relying on food stamps has jumped by 48 per cent (that's 14.9 million people) and enrolment in the program has increased for 32 consecutive months.
Today, about 40 per cent of all U.S. corn that's 15 per cent of global corn production or 5 per cent of all global grain is diverted into the corn ethanol scam in order to produce the energy equivalent of about 0.6 per cent of global oil needs. Corn prices, now close to $7 per bushel, have more than doubled over the past two years, says Bryce.
Source: Robert Bryce, Pork Barrel Ethanol Subsidies Have Doubled Corn Prices, Washington Examiner, August 10, 2011.
For text: http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/2011/08/manhattan-moment-pork-barrel-ethanol-subsidies-have-doubled-corn-prices
For more on Environment Issues: http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=31
First published by the National Center for Policy Analysis, United States
FMF Policy Bulletin/ 24 August 2011
FMF Policy Bulletin
Publish date: 01 September 2011
The views expressed in the article are the author’s and are not necessarily shared by the members of the Foundation.