Nationalised health-care system in Canada’s Alberta province in trouble
Raising taxes to cover expensive drugs and innovative technologies is not a viable option, according to an advisory council on the province of Alberta, Canada health care system. And "without fundamental changes in how we pay for health services, the current health system is not sustainable." By 2008 half the province's programme budget could be spent on health. Costs would eventually rise beyond taxpayers' willingness to pay, says the panel's report. Increasing the health care premiums paid by individuals to 20 percent from the current 11 percent of government-insured health services.
Instead, the government must decide which services should be covered by Medicare Canada's provincially administered, single-payer health insurance plan and which ones might be better left to individual decision makers.
Health care costs in Alberta are rising while waiting lists are long. Rather than further ration services to hold the line on costs, the advisory council recommends:
Explore medical savings accounts and variable premiums to give Albertans more control over their health care spending.
Cooperate with other provinces in strategies to restrain rising drug costs.
The advisory council says the government should increase competition in the provision of services. Policy changes Alberta has attempted in the past, such as instituting "user fees," have drawn sanctions from the federal government for violating the Canada Health Act, the federal statute that governs the health care system.
Source: Alberta Report Proposes Radical Changes to Funding Delivery of Health Care Services, BNA's Health Care Policy Report, January 14, 2002; based on A Framework for Reform: Report of the Premier's Advisory Council on Health, December 2001.
For report text http://www2.gov.ab.ca/home/health_first/
For more on Canadian Health system http://www.ncpa.org/iss/hea/
FMF Policy Bulletin\21 January 2002
Publish date: 30 January 2002
The views expressed in the article are the author’s and are not necessarily shared by the members of the Foundation.