NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF NEW MINIMUM WAGE IN AMERICA
The two houses of the U.S. Congress are in the midst of reconciling separate bills political observers expect will raise the current $5.15 minimum wage to $6.15 in two steps over the next two years. Restaurants and retailers have traditionally been the two sectors of the economy most affected by minimum wage increases.
Experts expect the economic impact to vary, depending on whether a business is in a high-cost urban area or a low-cost rural one, whether employees are tipped or rely solely on wages, or whether the enterprise is in one of the 10 states plus the District of Columbia that have state minimum wages set higher than the federally-mandated floor.
With labour as scarce as it is and employers forced to compete for workers, many firms are already paying wages that meet or exceed the new standards. So the new mandate will have little effect on them.
But employers in low-wage areas may cut payrolls or at least not hire new applicants.
After the minimum was raised by 90 cents in two stages in 1996 and 1997, employment growth at eating and drinking establishments slowed to 129,100 in 1997 from 276,400 in 1995.
And menu prices which had long trailed inflation suddenly began to outpace inflation beginning in 1997.
In addition to Washington, D.C., the states having minimums higher than federal law are: Oregon, Washington, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Vermont, California, Delaware, Alaska and Hawaii.
Source: Robert D. Hershey Jr., The Cost of Not Living on a $5.15 Minimum, New York Times, September 19, 2000.
For more on Employment Effects of Minimum Wages
Minimum wage laws price the most needy and vulnerable members of society out of the job market. They do not get higher-paid jobs as a result of such laws they get no jobs at all. Those who support such laws are either cynically uncaring, deliberately intent on denying such people jobs, or so lacking in their understanding of the workings of economics that they are unknowingly cruel in their attempts to be kind. (Eustace Davie, Director, FMF).
Publish date: 11 October 2000
The views expressed in the article are the author’s and are not necessarily shared by the members of the Foundation.