Transnet strikers and other government employees are killing the golden goose

Zakhele Mthembu BA Law LLB (Wits) is a legal researcher at the Free Market Foundation. 

For interviews:

The views expressed in the article are the author's and not necessarily shared by the members of the Foundation.

This article may be republished without prior consent but with acknowledgement to the author.

The FMF is an independent, non-profit, public benefit organisation, created in 1975 by pro-free market business and civil society national bodies to work for
a non-racial, free and prosperous South Africa.
As a policy organisation it promotes sound economic policies and the principles
of good law. As a think tank it seeks and puts forward solutions to some of the country's most pressing problems: unemployment, poverty, growth, education, health care, electricity supply, and more. The FMF was instrumental in the post-apartheid negotiations and directly influenced the Constitutional Commission to include the property
rights clause: a critical cornerstone of economic freedom.

+27 11 884 0270
PO Box 4056, Cramerview 2060

This article was first published on City Press on 10 November 2022

Transnet strikers and other government employees are killing the golden goose

With news of public sector employees demanding above inflation wage increases and workers at Transnet going on strike this year, the role of government in employment must is reconsidered to determine whether it is beneficial to our society.
South Africa boasts a large public sector. Over 12% of the GDP is directed to the wage bill of the state alone, according to the OECD’s 2020 economic survey of South Africa. This would be welcomed by some if it meant mass state employment. Yet National Treasury has explained that wage increases, instead of raw mass employment, are the reason for the high public sector wage bill.
South Africa subscribes to a (misguided) commitment to the government playing a leading role in economic activities, including employment. The ANC government inherited a public sector that was used by the previous regime to ensure employment for the white minority population. The ANC, predictably, sought to do the same, using government employment for the black majority.
The obvious problem is that redistribution is used as a substitute for actual growth and production in the improvement of people’s lives. Redistribution is all government can do, since its operations, which are necessarily funded by taxation, presume production by taxed entities or individuals. We must ask ourselves whether a focus on redistribution is a beneficial substitute for productive economic activity? The answer is clear to see when one looks at countries that took the logic of state redistribution to its conclusion and became socialist and/or communist.
The public sector wage bill accounted for over 35.4% of total government expenditure in the fiscal year 2018/2019 according to the Treasury. Public sector wage expenditure has grown faster than any other budgetary category since 2006/07, except for payments for financial assets.
This increase has coincided with depressed economic growth rates when contrasted with other developing economies, and increasing unemployment especially among the youth. The youth are the people who are supposed to be the most economically active. Then there is the personal income tax rate that ranks among the highest in Africa and the world.
The argument that the public sector cannot be the primary vehicle for the improvement of the material conditions of the population is intuitive.
The public sector presumes productive activity happening outside of government, otherwise it cannot be funded. Therefore, there needs to be more people participating in economic activity that generates taxable revenue.
Those in the employ of the public service have those in the private sector, generating the taxes that make up their compensation, to thank. From the everyday Sipho who buys an item that has a sales tax (ironically named a value added tax) to the high-income earning individual who pays over 40% of their income in taxes. These are the people who are the actual bosses of the public service, including the politicians in Cape Town, the bureaucrats in Pretoria, and the judges in Bloemfontein.
What this realisation – of who public sector employees should be grateful for – does, is make it clear that the golden goose that is the private sector and its participants should not be killed or unduly strained. There should be more people in the private sector, more activity happening there, with greater freedom rather than the central role the government plays in the economic affairs of South Africans.
Unions like the Public Servants Association of South Africa, United National Transport Union, and South African Transport and Allied Workers Union should bear in mind that our taxes as the South African public are the reason that they have members. Their demands should be cognizant of our economic context and most importantly, of our right as the South African public to reject their demands should we deem it fit.
The Transnet strike seems to indicate that public sector employees are not at all thankful to the productive members of society generating economic activity, and therefore tax revenue, to pay their wages. The strikers appeared more than willing to tank the economy.
Instead of a capable state, which is always doublespeak for a bigger, more expensive state, there should be a deliberate effort to grow the private sector. The mentality that government, which is sustained by the private sector, should be the main economic player, must perish.
South Africa’s public sector wage bill must come down, government spending must be curtailed, and taxes must be significantly decreased. All this must be done and advocated for, lest we find ourselves hastening our march down the road to serfdom which we have been on for a while already.

Help FMF promote the rule of law, personal liberty, and economic freedom become an individual member / donor HERE ... become a corporate member / donor HERE