Why is the euro so weak and what’s ahead for it?
When the euro made its debut, it was worth around U.S. $1.17. Recently, after repeated interventions by the European Central Bank, it was down to 86 cents. The U.S. has been deregulating and freeing up its economy for the past 25 years which has enhanced the rate of return on capital here and attracted investments from Europe and elsewhere.
The rate of return on capital in the U.S. has been higher than in Europe's welfare states for a long time, according to research by Anthony Norfield at the ABN AMRO Bank in London.
The gap between U.S. and European returns has widened from 2.1 percent in 1998 to 2.6 percent today.
What's happened to the euro is similar to what has been happening to the Canadian dollar for years both are "undervalued" because both regions must pay for bloated welfare states.
What does the future hold? Euro boosters are taking some comfort from the expected slowdown in the U.S. economy and a resulting lowering of profitability of American companies. But these should be short-term phenomena. And a slowdown is underway in Europe, too.
Beyond the short-term, the euro will continue its weak performance vis-a-vis the dollar until European nations curb their free-spending ways and jettison government obstacles to business efficiency.
American businesses still labour under some of those burdens. But not to the extent their European cousins do.
Source: Steve H. Hanke (Johns Hopkins University), The Euro's Rebound? Forbes, December 11, 2000.
For Hanke column http://www.forbes.com/hanke
For more on Currency Issues http://www.ncpa.org/pi/internat/intdex2.html
RSA Note: South African politicians and civil servants should take note of this article. Essentially it is saying that the euro has lost value because European governments are over-burdening businesses with taxes and regulations. As business and capital has become more mobile, owners will no longer tolerate excessive burdens. Politicians are probably most frustrated by this phenomenon, which is part of what has become known as globalisation. The investors dont argue they either leave or stay away. If governments wish to keep and entice investors they have to create investor-friendly environments that do not interfere with the efficiency of business operations.
Eustace Davie, director, FMF.
Publish date: 19 December 2000
The views expressed in the article are the author’s and are not necessarily shared by the members of the Foundation. This article may be republished without prior consent but with acknowledgement to the author.